Skip to content

Reviewer & Editors

01. Reviewer (e.g., prof.reviewer@uni.edu)

Role Description: Performs initial quality and research content review. Ensures the submission is original, complete, and meets the collection’s academic standards.

Actions:

  1. Log in.
  2. Click Profile [1]→ MyDSpace [2]→ Workflow Tasks [3].

image
3. Open the assigned submission. image
4. Review the research paper [4].

Options: - Approve [5] → sends to Editor.

  • Reject [6]→ notifies Submitter of rejection.
  • Request revisions → sends back to Submitter. image

Example Reviewer Comments:

"The methodology section lacks detail. Please add a flowchart of your experimental process and resubmit."

2. Editor

Role: Ensures metadata accuracy, improves item visibility, and curates content.
What the Editor Does:
Access the Approved Submission:
- Log in as the editor (e.g., editor.cs@uni.edu).
- Click Profile [1]→ MyDSpace [2]→ Workflow Tasks [3]

image

image

Edit Metadata:
- Fix typos in the title/abstract.
- Add missing keywords (e.g., "machine learning, climate modeling").
- Ensure Dublin Core fields (author, date, subject) are accurate.

Curate the Item:
- Assign a persistent identifier (e.g., Handle or DOI).
- Link related items (e.g., datasets, code repositories).

image

image

Example Editor Actions:

Added keywords "AI ethics" and corrected author affiliation formatting.

3. Final Editor (Site Admin)

Role: Oversees final approval and publication.
What the Site Admin Does:

1. Final Review:

  • Log in as the Final Editor (e.g., finaleditor@gmail.com).

image

  • Click Profile [1]→ MyDSpace [2]→ Workflow Tasks [3]

image

2. Approve for Archiving:
- Ensure the submission meets institutional standards.
- Click Accept to publish the item to the collection.

image

3. Assign Access Rights:
- Set embargo periods (if needed).
- Confirm licensing (e.g., Creative Commons).

4. Collection Admin

Role: Manages the collection’s structure and permissions.
What the Collection Admin Does:
1. Monitor Submissions:
- Track workflow progress (e.g., pending reviews, rejected items).
2. Adjust Policies:
- Update submission guidelines or metadata requirements.
- Modify roles (e.g., add/remove reviewers).

Workflow Summary

  1. Submitter: Submits item → enters workflow.
  2. Reviewer: Approves/rejects → sends to editor.
  3. Editor: Refines metadata → sends to Site Admin.
  4. Site Admin: Publishes item → archived in the collection.

Key DSpace Pages for Each Role

  • Reviewer: Administration → Submissions → [Collection Name]
  • Editor: Administration → Curate → [Collection Name]
  • Site Admin: Administration → Submissions (for final approval).

🛠 Editor (e.g., editor.cs@uni.edu)

Role Description: Responsible for metadata editing, formatting checks, and curation.

Actions:

  • Log in.
  • Click Profile → MyDSpace → Workflow Tasks.
  • Open the assigned submission.
  • Review and improve metadata (title, abstract, authors, keywords).
  • Approve and send to Final Editor, or mark complete if no Final Editor.

✍️ Final Editor (e.g., finaleditors.cs@uni.edu)

Role Description: Performs final verification and quality assurance before publication.

Actions:

  • Log in.
  • Click Profile → MyDSpace → Workflow Tasks.
  • Open the assigned submission.
  • Perform last checks (licensing, embargo, formatting).
  • Approve → Item becomes published and publicly visible in Final Year Projects 2024 collection.